Deploying a Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) tool is a major milestone—but it’s not always smooth sailing. While the promise of automation, visibility, and standardization is compelling, many organizations struggle with the actual rollout and adoption of GRC platforms. Challenges range from poor user adoption to process misalignment, configuration complexity, and lack of executive sponsorship.
At COMPASS, we’ve worked with dozens of small and mid-sized enterprises (SMEs) during GRC platform implementations. This blog highlights the most common challenges in GRC tool deployment—and how COMPASS addresses them to ensure successful adoption and value realization.
Many legacy GRC tools are difficult to navigate and require significant training. Users, especially outside the risk or compliance teams, often find these systems intimidating or irrelevant to their daily roles.
COMPASS prioritizes user-friendliness. With role-based views, intuitive dashboards, and guided task flows, end users only see what’s relevant to them. This reduces friction and makes engagement with compliance workflows part of daily operations, not an afterthought.
Too often, GRC tools are implemented based on technical specifications rather than how
governance and compliance actually function within the business. This leads to a disconnect between platform features and organizational needs.
As a consulting-first product, COMPASS deployments are led by experts who understand real-world processes. Our platform allows for configuration based on actual risk, control, and compliance workflows—ensuring alignment with how your teams operate.
Some tools don’t support end-to-end mapping between risks, controls, issues, and policies—resulting in fragmented data, unclear ownership, and missed insights.
COMPASS offers pre-built risk-control mappings, integrated issue workflows, and the ability to link tasks and assessments across the GRC lifecycle. This ensures traceability and faster detection of systemic issues.
In many organizations, risk and compliance responsibilities are distributed across functions. Without clear task ownership in the GRC platform, activities fall through the cracks.
With task assignments, escalations, and ownership tied to specific controls, risks, and vendors, COMPASS ensures accountability is built into the platform. Teams are notified, tracked, and reminded based on their roles.
Off-the-shelf GRC tools often require extensive customization to match organizational needs, leading to budget overruns and delayed go-lives.
COMPASS is modular and configurable by design. Whether it’s compliance workflows, risk scoring, or vendor assessments, our users can tailor the platform without code-level changes.
When tools don’t provide on-demand compliance snapshots, audit preparation becomes a
scramble to pull together documentation and evidence.
The Snapshot feature in COMPASS allows organizations to capture control, risk, and compliance status at any point—making audits faster, cleaner, and less disruptive.
Successful GRC tool deployment is not just about choosing the right platform—it’s about how that platform integrates with people, processes, and priorities. Challenges are inevitable, but they can be overcome with thoughtful implementation, strong user engagement, and tools that are designed for usability and adaptability.
COMPASS bridges the gap between GRC theory and execution. It’s a platform built with the realities of SMEs in mind, drawing on years of cybersecurity and compliance consulting to solve not just technical problems—but business ones. If you’re looking to roll out GRC without the common pitfalls, COMPASS delivers.
©2024 COMPASS